Analysis Problem of the Day 66

Today’s problem appeared as Problem 12 on the UCLA Spring 2024 Analysis Qual:

Problem 12. Let P(w,z) = w^3(2-w)^3 + z.

a) Show that for z \in \mathbb{D}, P(\cdot,z) has precisely three roots for w \in \mathbb{D}.

b) Let w_1(z),w_2(z),w_3(z) be the roots in a). Show that w_1(z)+w_2(z)+w_3(z) is holomorphic on \mathbb{D}.


Solution: a) We are asked to count roots, so it is natural to use a theorem relating the number of roots, say, Rouche’s theorem. Indeed, for |z|<1 and |w|=1, |z|<|w^3(2-w)^3|=1, so w^3(2-w)^3 and w^3(2-w)^3+z have the same number of roots on \mathbb{D}. But the former has three roots at 0 and three roots at 2, so P(\cdot,z) has precisely three roots on \mathbb{D} for z \in \mathbb{D}.

b) We use the generalized argument principle. Indeed, it states that for g(w)=w, one can write the above function as

    \[w_1(z)+w_2(z)+w_3(z)= \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{|w|=1}w \frac{\partial_w P(w,z)}{P(w,z)} dw.\]

It suffices to show that the integral is holomorphic in z. It is clearly continuous in z since P is, and

    \[\int_\Delta \int_{|w|=1} w \frac{\partial_w P(w,z)}{P(w,z)}dw dz = \int_{|w|=1} w \partial_w P(w,z) \int_{\Delta} \frac{1}{w^3(2-w)^3+z} dz dw.\]

Since |w|=1 and |z|<1, w^3(2-w)^3+z does not vanish for z \in \Delta, i.e. the integrand is holomorphic and the contour integral thus vanishes by Cauchy’s theorem. It follows by Morera’s theorem that the original integral is continuous in z and its contour integrals vanish over triangles in the unit disk, so by Morera’s theorem it defines a holomorphic function on the unit disk, and we are done.

Remark: This argument generalizes to show that if P(\cdot,z): V \subseteq \mathbb{C}^2 \to \mathbb{C} is a holomorphic function with roots w_1(z),w_2(z),...,w_n(z) and g is holomorphic, then \sum_{i=1}^n g(w_i(z)) is holomorphic for z \in U whenever P(w,z) \not = 0 for w \in \partial V, z \in U.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *