Analysis Problem of the Day 9

The following exercise is Problem 1 on Stanford’s Fall 2022 Analysis Qual:

Problem 1: Let Y \subseteq \mathbb{R} be a non-empty compact subset. Show that there exists a Hilbert space H and a self-adjoint bounded linear operator T: H \to H such that the spectrum of T is exactly Y.


Solution: As with a lot of problems regarding (separable) Hilbert spaces, the prototypical example that one should be working with is H=l^2. Our goal is to make the spectrum of T equal precisely to Y, that is, make T-\lambda I invertible if and only if \lambda \not \in Y. Now, one easy way to make an operator non-invertible is to force it to send non-trivial elements to zero, that is, have a non-empty kernel. However, with l^2, one is working with at most countably many terms – so how does one ensure the kernel is nonempty for all of the (possibly uncountably many) elements of Y?

Well, one doesn’t. Instead, we will approximate all elements of Y by a countable subset. In fact, since Y is compact, Y is separable, so by definition, it has a countable dense subset Y' \subseteq Y. Let \lambda_1, \lambda_2,... be an enumeration of elements of Y'. Then, define the operator T: l^2 \to l^2 by

    \[T(a_1,a_2,...) = (\lambda_1 a_1, \lambda_2 a_2,...)\]

Note that T is bounded since

    \[\|Ta\|_{l^2} = \sum_i |\lambda_i a_i|^2 \leq (\sup_i |\lambda_i|) \sum_i |a_i|^2 \leq (\sup_{\lambda \in Y} |\lambda|) \|a\|_{l^2}.\]

Claim 1: Y' \subseteq \sigma(T) i.e. Y' is contained in the spectrum of T. This is true since the non-zero element a \in H given by (a)_j = \delta_{ij} satisfies Ta =0 and thus belongs to \ker(T-\lambda_i I), so T-\lambda_i I is not invertible.

Claim 2: Y \subseteq \sigma(T). This can be seen in two ways. The easy way is to recall that the spectrum of a bounded operator is always compact, so if Y' \subseteq \sigma(T), then the closure is also contained in the spectrum, i.e. \overline{Y'} = Y \subseteq \sigma(T). More explicitly, if one were to attempt to construct an inverse S=(T-\lambda)^{-1} for \lambda \in Y \setminus Y', then

    \[S(a_1,a_2,...) = ((\lambda_1-\lambda)a_1,(\lambda_2-\lambda)a_2,...).\]

However, this operator is not bounded, i.e. an inequality of the form \|Sa\| \leq C\|a\| cannot hold for any C>0. This is because for a sequence of elements a_n \in l^2, (a_n)_i = \delta_{im}, where m=m(n) is chosen so that \lambda_m \to \lambda as n \to \infty (which is possible since we Y' is dense in Y), we have that \|Sa_n\| =1 but \|a_n\| \to 0 as n \to \infty. Thus, while S would exist as an unbounded operator, it is still not bounded and therefore \lambda \in \sigma(T).

Claim 3: Y^c \subseteq \rho(T). This can be seen by directly constructing the inverse S=(T-\lambda I)^{-1} for \lambda \in Y^c as

    \[S(a_1,a_2,...) = \left(\frac{a_1}{\lambda_1-\lambda},\frac{a_2}{\lambda_2-\lambda},...\right)\]

Since \inf_i |\lambda_i - \lambda| >0, we obtain that S: l^2 \to l^2 is bounded, so \lambda \in \rho(T). Finally, T is self-adjoint since it is a bounded normal operator with real spectrum.

Remark: The same argument easily extends to showing that for any compact Y \subset \mathbb{C}, there exists an operator T: l^2 \to l^2 with \sigma(T)=Y.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *